Commentary “Recent advances in circadian rhythms in cardiovascular system”

Citation: Fournier S and Muller O (2015) Commentary " Recent advances in circadian rhythms in cardiovascular system ". Front. Pharmacol. 6:132. We read the recent publication by Chen and Yang with interest (Chen and Yang, 2015). In this review of excellent quality, the authors detail our current understanding of the links between circadian rhythms and cardiovascular system. Nevertheless, several important aspects of many recent key-findings have been overlooked in the Section " Circadian Rhythms and Myocardial Infarction. " In fact, the authors focus on the well-documented higher rate of myocardial infarction occurring in the morning and on the circadian variation of cardiac functions related to the heart remodeling. From our point of view, they fail to discuss various recent important publications based on robust data supporting a link between circadian rhythms and myocardial infarction size and death from myocardial infarction. Indeed, different clinical studies recently reported circadian variations of ischemic burden in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In Reiter et al. (2012) and our team (Fournier et al., 2012) observed higher peak creatine kinase (CK) activity (as a proxy for myocardial infarction size) in patients with symptoms onset occurring between 00:00 and 05:59. Accordingly, these data indicate a shift between hour of maximal occurrence (in the second part of the morning) and time of maximal severity. In 2013, differences in terms of vulnerability of the cardiomyocyte to ischemia were studied in 1021 patients undergoing elective percuaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2007 and 2011 (Fournier et al., 2014). Patients were divided into two groups according to the starting time of the PCI: the morning group (n = 651) between 07:00 and 11:59, and the afternoon group (n = 370) between 12:00 and 18:59. The rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction was statistically lower in the morning group compared to the afternoon group (20% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). This difference remained statistically significant after propensity score matching (21% vs. 29%, p = 0.03). Finally, in 2014 and 2015, two important studies by Mahmoud et al. (2014) and by our team (Fournier et al., 2015) confirmed the initial results based on STEMI patients. From a multicenter registry of 6799 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI between 2004 and 2010, Mahmoud et al. observed that infarct size exhibited circadian variation with largest infarct size in patients with symptom onset around 3 in the morning (estimated peak CK 1322 U/l; 95% confidence interval …